Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: New News Entry
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 20:41:59 -0000
Message-ID: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4527B56@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] New News Entry
Thread-Index: AcTT20rLrT66fWeFS267FFqwf1JbwgAHQYEw
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Devrim GUNDUZ" <devrim@gunduz.org>,
	"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Cc: "PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>

=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:devrim@gunduz.org]=20
> Sent: 26 November 2004 17:14
> To: Marc G. Fournier
> Cc: Dave Page; PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] New News Entry
>=20
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>=20
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>=20
> >> Good point, but AFAIK Reply-to header cannot have more=20
> than 1 email...=20
> >> Right?
> >
> > Erk, probably not ... how about adding a CC for the=20
> submitter instead? =20
> > I know I generally do a 'reply all' when replying, and the CC would=20
> > let the address come through the list ...
>=20
> Umm I don't think that CC'ing that mail is a good idea... ?

Can't see why myself. Have I missed something obvious?

/D