X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6F53A6035 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 21:40:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93999-03 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 21:40:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.91]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F083A6025 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 21:40:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CbQab-0009JG-CK for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 21:40:13 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Subject: Re: New site - minor problem Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 21:40:12 -0000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] New site - minor problem Thread-Index: AcTb20Ejd1rHT4H7TAOJ6pPreCij2wAAFefg From: "Dave Page" To: "John Hansen" , "Joshua D. Drake" Cc: "Gavin M. Roy" , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.007 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200412/119 X-Sequence-Number: 6238 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: John Hansen [mailto:john@geeknet.com.au]=20 > Sent: 06 December 2004 21:31 > To: Joshua D. Drake > Cc: Dave Page; Gavin M. Roy; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] New site - minor problem >=20 > > I would say, if there is not a reasonably open source=20 > alternative then=20 > > go for it... I have not problem with us using a closed=20 > source module=20 > > if it is the best for the job. >=20 > What's wrong with using maxmind's ip2country database? >=20 > Having read the thread, I'm still unclear as to what the=20 > problem really is. The problem is that we go to great lengths to mirror the site and minimise the points of failure, and then add code in that forces all selection of those mirrors downloads of our software through 1 database dependent script that provides very little benefit to the end user.=20 My earlier concern was that it would have too great of an effect on our leased line, but having looked at the server logs and done a little math, I realise now I was worrying about nothing. Regards, Dave.