X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BEB83A601E for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:01:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 98852-06 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:01:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.88]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107C83A5FF7 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:01:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CbQvZ-000DUD-1E for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 22:01:53 +0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Subject: Re: New site - minor problem Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:01:52 -0000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] New site - minor problem Thread-Index: AcTb3oG6C9/0CTqnSvOdcGi7AP1sWQAAEyJQ From: "Dave Page" To: "John Hansen" Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , "Gavin M. Roy" , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.007 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200412/121 X-Sequence-Number: 6240 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: John Hansen [mailto:john@geeknet.com.au]=20 > Sent: 06 December 2004 21:55 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Joshua D. Drake; Gavin M. Roy; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: RE: [pgsql-www] New site - minor problem >=20 > Maxminds API's are not nescessarily database dependant. I=20 > even think they have an apache module. If not, writing one=20 > would be trivial. >=20 > However all these solutions would require mirrors to install=20 > the modules on their servers no? or are we generating the=20 > mirror selection pages statically, customised to the mirror=20 > region? if so, what exactly would the ip2country modules be used for? No, that's the point. All the mirrors would be selected on the master server, giving a single point of failure. I'm far from convinced that it's worth it. The *only* benefit to users is that the flags for their country would be shown seperately on the mirror selection pages, saving them may 2 seconds to spot their flag in the main grid. Regards, Dave.