Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] aclchk.c refactor 
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:49:14 -0000
Message-ID: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7E5A6@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] [PATCHES] aclchk.c refactor 
Thread-Index: AcX2i+5287xxlV8zTIy9guj5Ok7xjwAAq2og
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	"Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: "Marc Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
	<pgsql-www@postgresql.org>

=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org=20
> [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: 01 December 2005 15:29
> To: Alvaro Herrera
> Cc: Marc Fournier; pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [PATCHES] aclchk.c refactor=20
>=20
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > I applied this patch yesterday, but I did not receive the commit
> > message.  However I do see it in the online archives.
>=20
> > Is there something fishy going on here, or just the mail=20
> was lost on its
> > way here?
>=20
> [ checks mail logs... ]  Hm, I never got a copy of this either:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-11/msg00609.php
>=20
> There's definitely something flaky about pgsql-committers since the
> server move.  I still haven't seen anything about Michael's=20
> ecpg commits
> of yesterday, either.

Mail from there probably comes from tgl@postgresql.org now rather than
tgl@svr1.postgresql.org from what Marc told me yesterday. I suspect
Majordomo needs to be told that.

Regards, Dave.