Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0611E9FBAC9; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:19:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 94115-01-3; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:19:44 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from noel.decibel.org (noel.decibel.org [67.100.216.10]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC5E9FBA7A; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:19:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [10.24.53.178] (72-254-1-43.client.stsn.net [72.254.1.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by noel.decibel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB294564A3; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 00:19:02 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: <20070727081331.GB2908@svr2.hagander.net> References: <20070725054838.71190DCC143@svr2.hagander.net> <46A700A3.40903@postgresql.org> <20070725081046.GA5612@svr2.hagander.net> <689CC6B9-F8AC-426C-B595-7DA7AB2D3E8C@decibel.org> <20070727081331.GB2908@svr2.hagander.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , Dave Page , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Decibel! Subject: Re: Advocacy wiki Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:02:31 -0700 To: Magnus Hagander X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200707/76 X-Sequence-Number: 12223 On Jul 27, 2007, at 1:13 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> And, do you have the time / energy to actually moderate such a >>> beast ... I >>> think one of the bigger fears is ppl uploading mis-information into >>> such an >>> "official wiki", and I think that fear is fairly justified with the >>> amount of >>> spam-bots going around filling in forms left-right-and-center ... >> >> If it's dependent on a single person to keep it clean, we're doing >> something wrong. :) > > Yeah, you never looked at the docs comment sbefore, did you? There was > whole team of people supposed to keep taht clean, and we had > *thousands* of > spam and support questions in there. The rate was at least 3 junk > for every > one good. > > Now we require a login (that it's really easy to sign up for), and > spam is > down to pretty much zero and the good-to-bad ratio is *much* better. > > Bottom line: in theory it works fine, but I doubt it'll work in > practice. > It's been proven not to before. We should absolutely require a login/account... my point was that restricting all editing to just official community members is too restrictive for a lot of things. -- Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby decibel@decibel.org EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)