Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rh8QR-009mcI-8o for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 13:32:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rh8QP-008B0j-Sq for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 13:32:14 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rh8QP-008B0b-MY for pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 13:32:14 +0000 Received: from smtp.outgoing.loopia.se ([93.188.3.37]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rh8QJ-002j76-Ml for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 13:32:13 +0000 Received: from s807.loopia.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FA22FFDC77 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 14:31:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from s934.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.6]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2940E2E29AE9; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 14:31:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from s473.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.6]) by s934.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2716F7CEABA; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 14:31:41 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amavis.loopia.se X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.21 tagged_above=-999 required=6.2 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: s473.loopia.se (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yesql.se Received: from s981.loopia.se ([172.22.191.6]) by s473.loopia.se (s473.loopia.se [172.22.190.13]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with UTF8LMTP id SGz-3K55r5SE; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 14:31:40 +0100 (CET) X-Loopia-Auth: user X-Loopia-User: daniel@yesql.se X-Loopia-Originating-IP: 89.255.232.193 Received: from smtpclient.apple (customer-89-255-232-193.stosn.net [89.255.232.193]) (Authenticated sender: daniel@yesql.se) by s981.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7AC8322B17A2; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 14:31:40 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yesql.se; s=loopiadkim1707475645; t=1709559100; bh=81oVaWfV319yZN5d+2+qQ/v5X0WNu/AKdOeOpeXHy4k=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=NWDCzub+fsdMVzYMcrfSq32fUGuEBiVQO5VIKMfFK4ok0qkUoXRcEvSRtZsXzGp2g D5nWuDkNvJROo4xljITPivFA5fK4Ly755rW0SGagjyFW8AzbR4myOcKHRm4ieZd5br NfAmh3d/4XmQfeqeBfxV1WP6TncYvjmGp3FcaTrGe8v+2xwUHBf07nG2uCLbQVO9/4 DJW5mrgzj3ZZACCOJm5KF4fp6nmbAiD3loEne4MBgCxGGGAip5uz3ZWPXb7/GqrnCg fg6RBu0x0bR/TX4kEj18KEgcr7iD3rXy+4n+R048BaSOS/qzbTBs4A78FcUeQ4tNSx p0KBz27Ln6wkQ== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.4\)) Subject: Re: Diff of this page with other version From: Daniel Gustafsson In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 14:31:40 +0100 Cc: Alvaro Herrera , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <202403021444.yyabqn4eatpx@alvherre.pgsql> To: Marcos Pegoraro X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.4) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk > On 4 Mar 2024, at 14:11, Marcos Pegoraro wrote: > I understand your point but cannot imagine a tool that does all those = points I've detailed. Googling for "diff two webpages", taking the first hit and plugging in = the CREATE TABLE page you used as an example gave me a comparison which = pulled out the STORAGE changes very clearly. It didn't look exactly like your = mockups, but it did the job. > And about uglification of document source, what I propose is just = another internal tag=20 > for each version. same way you use , , etc, you = would use ,=20 > and so on, just that. So I don't think it is a uglification of = document source. Adding versionspecific tags to the docs seems like quite the = backpatching hazard, which makes this a tough sell. -- Daniel Gustafsson=