public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Nasby <[email protected]>
To: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mail archive indexes are broken, URLs too
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:12:06 -0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>

On Jul 16, 2006, at 2:43 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
>> When Marc fixed the message-boundary pattern and regenerated the
>> archives, many of the existing messages changed URLs because they
>> got assigned slightly different numbers.  I notice that the archive
>> search engine hasn't yet tracked this change --- if you do a search
>> and click on a link to a message, you'll arrive at a message close
>> to the one you want but probably not quite it.
>>
>> Regenerating the archive indexes is presumably not hard, but there's
>> a bigger problem: for awhile now many of us have been in the habit
>> of citing old discussions by archive URLs.  All those links are now
>> broken too, and I can't think of any easy way to fix them.  And then
>> there's Google etc.
>>
>> I wonder if it'd be better to revert the regeneration of the  
>> archives,
>> and only apply the new message-boundary pattern to future messages.
>
> Nope, for one simple reason ... if, for some reason, at some point  
> in the future, we have to regenerate everything anyway (ie. the  
> last time we did a major template change for the archives), all the  
> #'ng is going to end up reverting back to what it is now ... so  
> we'd only be 'delaying the inevitable' ...

This is a problem for most mailing lists, but I think it's a critical  
one for us since we depend very, very heavily on the archives.

Can we change the lists so that they will generate a UUID and add it  
to message headers, and then allow the archive software to key off of  
that?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      [email protected]
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461





view thread (15+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Mail archive indexes are broken, URLs too
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox