X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165BCD1B49F; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:53:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34028-04; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:53:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: from win.lh.vix.com (win.lh.vix.com [204.152.188.39]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75508D1B46C; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:53:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from house.payne.org (h000625e9c972.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.218.241.71]) (authenticated) by win.lh.vix.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i3S4f2M19953; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:41:03 -0400 Received: from office2 ([10.19.69.1]) by house.payne.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id i3S2iWL2032489; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 22:44:32 -0400 From: "Andrew Payne" To: "scott.marlowe" Cc: "Bruce Momjian" , "PostgreSQL-development" , "PostgreSQL advocacy" Subject: Re: What can we learn from MySQL? Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 22:51:08 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200404/273 X-Sequence-Number: 4245 Scott Marlowe wrote: > While Apache is and has been wildly popular for bulk hosing and domain > parking, for serious commercial use, Netscape's enterprise server, now Sun > One, has long been a leader in commercial web sites. Netscrape/SunONE may have been a leader in some sub-market, but this misses the point. Apache + NCSA never had less than 50% market share, overall. http://news.netcraft.com/archives/web_server_survey.html Postgres is in a completely different situation: 95+?% of the world's databases don't run on Postgres, and it's been this way for a long time. Also, Apache never had "MyApache", a more popular version that many believe to be "free" and "open source". My point: Apache was successful in a situation that may not apply here. Does anyone know of an open source project that *has* successfully displaced a market of mature, established products WITHOUT a commercial entity providing marketing, support & direction? -andy