Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35019F9454
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Sun,  4 Nov 2007 15:28:58 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 61369-01 for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Sun,  4 Nov 2007 15:28:56 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from mail63.csoft.net (leary.csoft.net [205.205.214.5])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C83199F9458
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Sun,  4 Nov 2007 15:28:55 -0400 (AST)
Received: (qmail 10521 invoked by uid 1112); 4 Nov 2007 19:28:54 -0000
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 14:28:54 -0500 (EST)
From: Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>
X-X-Sender: books@leary.csoft.net
To: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
cc: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>,
	Chander Ganesan <chander@otg-nc.com>,
	"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>, Kevin Hunter <hunteke@earlham.edu>,
	Postgres WWW List <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>,
	Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: Training events policy ... first test case
In-Reply-To: <200711041819560000@152687804>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.64.0711041422040.15538@leary.csoft.net>
References: <200711041819560000@152687804>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200711/112
X-Sequence-Number: 12890



On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Dave Page wrote:

>> ------- Original Message -------
>> From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
>> To: Chander Ganesan <chander@otg-nc.com>
>> Sent: 04/11/07, 17:39:21
>> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Training events policy ... first test case
>>
>> However I do see a flood of entries later from Certfirst. Not to be an
>> ass, but this problem goes away for the forseeable future if we just
>> ban Certfirst from posting training events. There is no way they are
>> running all those classes.
>
> Any talk along those lines should not be held in this public forum.
>

I don't see why not.  This whole thread has been full of vague, "some 
companies" are doing bad things.  If there are bad apples out there, let's 
expose them.  While it may not be appropriate to speak for the community 
yet, I don't see why individuals naming names is a bad thing.  It focuses 
the actual discussion back to reality and let's people in the know have 
some useful information when discussing or considering training.

Your suggestion implies that instead of doing this publicly a www team 
cabal should decide this in some back room and not inform anyone of it.

Kris Jurka