X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9458329ED6;
	Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:04:20 +0100 (BST)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 30614-03; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:04:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ra.sai.msu.su (ra.sai.msu.su [158.250.29.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0701329D83;
	Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:04:10 +0100 (BST)
Received: from ra (ra [158.250.29.2])
	by ra.sai.msu.su (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8UF3uQT024636;
	Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:03:56 +0400 (MSD)
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:03:56 +0400 (MSD)
From: Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>
X-X-Sender: megera@ra.sai.msu.su
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Cc: John Hansen <john@geeknet.com.au>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: archives.postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <20040930112305.N3407@ganymede.hub.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0409301900000.23082@ra.sai.msu.su>
References: <1096518972.12322.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<20040930105736.L3407@ganymede.hub.org>
	<Pine.GSO.4.58.0409301816230.23082@ra.sai.msu.su>
	<20040930112305.N3407@ganymede.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200409/292
X-Sequence-Number: 5362

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, John Hansen wrote:
> >>
> >>> Guys,
> >>>
> >>> Now that archives has moved to commandprompt and changed layout, can we
> >>> please get the last-modified issue fixed, before I start the recrawl?
> >>
> >> What's wrong with the last-modified date?  I checked it the other day, and
> >> it looked fine to me ...
> >
> > you use <meta tag> for last-modified date, but crawlers does prefer more
> > standard way via http headers, as you once did using 'touch' hack
> > (what's wrong with it ?)
>
> To be honest, I want to figure out how to do it off of Message Date
> properly, instead of time stamp of the file ... that way, if we have to
> regenerate, all the 'last-modified' do stay the same ...

You should teach server software (php scripts) which form page and send it
to browser to output also http header with know date of the message.
It should be available in php.

>
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664
>

	Regards,
		Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83