public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Oleg Bartunov <[email protected]>
To: Dave Page <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: search.postgresql.org
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:49:00 +0300 (MSK)
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
I don't understand all this thread. Manual intervention brings to nothing
all search engine ranking and usually produce very bad results.
Is't possible to use citations ?
Also, is't possible to group results by sites ? This could soften effect
of incorrect ranking. At www.pgsql.ru/db/pgsearch we have no manual
weight correction and trust authors of web pages.
Oleg
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Joshua D. Drake"<[email protected]>
> Sent: 25/03/06 16:53:27
> To: "Tom Lane"<[email protected]>
> Cc: "PostgreSQL WWW"<[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] search.postgresql.org
>
>> It seems to me that archives should be secondly only to
>> www.postgresql.org.
>
> I disagree - the web search is intended to favour factual sites over the archives which may contain incorrect info. If you want to search the archives only you still can.
>
>> Once the new techdocs is live and we get some solid
>> content on there, then we can push that up.
>
> That is on www so will have the same rating.
>
> /D
>
> -----Unmodified Original Message-----
>
>> Um, what other resources are rated higher? If you'll pardon my
>> ignorance, what other resources is the search engine considering at all?
>
> Below is the weights. As John said earlier they just decide who's links
> show up first.
>
> It seems to me that archives should be secondly only to
> www.postgresql.org. Once the new techdocs is live and we get some solid
> content on there, then we can push that up.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> SiteWeight http://www.postgresql.org/ 100
> SiteWeight http://advocacy.postgresql.org/ 100
> SiteWeight http://jdbc.postgresql.org/ 100
> SiteWeight http://developer.postgresql.org/ 100
>
> # Authoritiative project site
> SiteWeight http://gborg.postgresql.org/ 75
> SiteWeight http://pgadmin.postgresql.org/ 75
> SiteWeight http://phppgadmin.sourceforge.net/ 75
> SiteWeight http://pgfoundry.org/ 75
>
> # User contributed stuff
> SiteWeight http://techdocs.postgresql.org/ 50
> SiteWeight http://archives.postgresql.org/ 50
>
> # Outside but reliable
> SiteWeight http://www.varlena.com/ 25
>
> # And the rest...
> SiteWeight http://www.postgresql.cl/ 0
> SiteWeight http://postgresql.ok.cz/ 0
> SiteWeight http://www.postgresql.jp/ 0
> SiteWeight http://www.postgresqlfr.org/ 0
> SiteWeight http://www.linuxshare.ru/ 0
> SiteWeight http://www.postgres.de/ 0
> SiteWeight http://www.pgsqldb.org/ 0
> SiteWeight http://www.postgresql.org.br/ 0
>
>
>
>
>
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru),
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: [email protected], http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
view thread (22+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: search.postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox