X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727409FD134 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:49:47 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55907-05 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:49:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from ra.sai.msu.su (ra.sai.msu.su [158.250.29.2]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067889FB282 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:49:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ra (ra [158.250.29.2]) by ra.sai.msu.su (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7SImxaD009295; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:48:59 +0400 (MSD) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:48:58 +0400 (MSD) From: Oleg Bartunov X-X-Sender: megera@ra.sai.msu.su To: Magnus Hagander cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , Naz Gassiep , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: PostgreSQL web site In-Reply-To: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FB7D@algol.sollentuna.se> Message-ID: References: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FB7D@algol.sollentuna.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/119 X-Sequence-Number: 10510 Also, I'd like to see PDA version of web site and archives. Current design is very inconvenient. Oleg On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> Just a suggestion, why don't the web admins turn mod_gzip on? There >>> are no downsides, and it would likely make a fairly large impact on >>> bandwidth bills. Think of all the people browsing the PG >> documentation >>> (myself included). Not only would bandwidth bills go down, >>> responsiveness on the docs would be higher as well. >>> >>> Even if there is no bandwidth saving (if your b/w is free for >>> instance), I'm of the opinion that mod_gzip and mod_deflate >> should be >>> used unless there is a compelling reason not to. >>> >>> Sorry if this has been discussed before, but I thought it was worth >>> mentioning on the off chance it hadn't. >> >> Actually that is a very good question... why are we not using >> mod_deflate? > > Good question. It's definitly worth investigating. It does add load to > the server, but not all that much. And if we have the space (need to > check that on some of the boxen) we could set up pre-compressed static > images and that argument would go away.. > > //Magnus > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > Regards, Oleg _____________________________________________________________ Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru), Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83