X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDBA63A49E7;
	Sat, 13 Nov 2004 02:48:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 49627-04; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 02:48:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr4.postgresql.org (svr4.postgresql.org [66.98.251.159])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC773A491B;
	Sat, 13 Nov 2004 02:47:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from linuxworld.com.au (unknown [203.34.46.50])
	by svr4.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F7F5AF4CF;
	Sat, 13 Nov 2004 00:06:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from localhost (swm@localhost)
	by linuxworld.com.au (8.11.6/8.11.4) with ESMTP id iACNtP013766;
	Sat, 13 Nov 2004 10:55:25 +1100
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 10:55:25 +1100 (EST)
From: Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
	Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>,
	pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org, Omar Kilani <omar@tinysofa.org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design
In-Reply-To: <20041112183310.F3792@ganymede.hub.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411131054360.13722@linuxworld.com.au>
References: <200411122226.iACMQ8T28212@candle.pha.pa.us>
	<20041112183310.F3792@ganymede.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200411/151
X-Sequence-Number: 5800

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Alexey Borzov wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>> Is the new website going to be rolled out in time for the 8.0 release,
> >>> which could be in the next few weeks?
> >>
> >> No.
> >
> > OK, fair enough.  Now can someone explain how we can put out a release
> > evrery 8-12 months with 200-300 changes, some very complex, and we can't
> > get a group together to update a web site?
>
> Glamour? :)  Its more glamous to say "I added so-n-so feature to the
> server for this release" then "I helped code HTML for the web site"? :)

I don't buy that, because lots of other projects, which have nothing to do
with web/graphics development, have great sites.

Gavin