X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65CA43A4A56;
	Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:13:53 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 76572-03; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:13:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from emo.org.tr (emo.org.tr [195.142.105.9])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DCE3A4A7C;
	Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:13:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by emo.org.tr (Postfix, from userid 41643)
	id 7F0A42FFD8; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 19:13:43 +0200 (EET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by emo.org.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771851121A3;
	Fri, 26 Nov 2004 19:13:43 +0200 (EET)
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 19:13:38 +0200 (EET)
From: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@gunduz.org>
X-X-Sender: devrim2@emo.org.tr
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>,
	PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: New News Entry
In-Reply-To: <20041126124353.N827@ganymede.hub.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411261901310.29733@emo.org.tr>
References: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4307378@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
	<Pine.LNX.4.61.0411261242270.8579@emo.org.tr>
	<20041126123446.L827@ganymede.hub.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.61.0411261836360.29733@emo.org.tr>
	<20041126124353.N827@ganymede.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No,
 hits=0.3 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UPPERCASE_25_50
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200411/370
X-Sequence-Number: 6101

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hi,

On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

>> Good point, but AFAIK Reply-to header cannot have more than 1 email... 
>> Right?
>
> Erk, probably not ... how about adding a CC for the submitter instead?  I 
> know I generally do a 'reply all' when replying, and the CC would let the 
> address come through the list ...

Umm I don't think that CC'ing that mail is a good idea... ?

- --
Devrim GUNDUZ 
devrim~gunduz.org				devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
  			http://www.tdmsoft.com
  			http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBp2RHtl86P3SPfQ4RAtOPAJ4nWB+aNUy2l7vV+JKswRpUu1OZmACfdmSK
zZ7loxx5wxOKxMt6EyNSNuQ=
=YZa6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----