Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 23:45:20 +0200 (EET)
From: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@gunduz.org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: translators@postgresql.org, pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org,
	pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [translators] Change in authentication for @postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <200511281330.11736.josh@agliodbs.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0511282344290.23113@mail.kivi.com.tr>
References: <200511281330.11736.josh@agliodbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-9; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hi,

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Josh Berkus wrote:

> If you have an @postgresql.org mailing address because you are a regional
> contact or on the web team and you use IMAP or POP access, you may need to
> change your login information.  Previously, the mail.postgresql.org server
> accepted "bare" usernames (i.e. "josh").   Now it requires "full"
> usernames (i.e. "josh@postgresql.org").  Your password has not changed.

That explains the reason why my Evolution complained all day. Thanks for 
the info.

Cheers,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
Kivi Biliţim Teknolojileri         -          http://www.kivi.com.tr
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
                       http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDi3p14zE8DGqpiZARAggMAJ48xouYkflLlPDK9gOiDZ6guQTvZQCfVKhJ
C8mjjtHM14ZGlDjRSnsbFRs=
=+bXt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org  Tue Nov 29 04:46:55 2005
X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326919DCBF7;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 04:46:54 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
 by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 07555-06; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 04:46:54 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.91])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7373E9DCAB3;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2005 04:46:51 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=vale-housing.co.uk)
	by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42)
	id 1Eh18W-000OKn-BH; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:46:52 +0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: svr2/unionfs
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:46:52 -0000
Message-ID: <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7E430@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: svr2/unionfs
Thread-Index: AcX0KnZLGu6JGGz1So+bFPKuGWE7JAAAB64gAArUfyAAGsB+gA==
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>,
	"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Cc: <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.356 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.356]
X-Spam-Score: 0.356
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200511/185
X-Sequence-Number: 8900

=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:mha@sollentuna.net]=20
> Sent: 28 November 2005 19:59
> To: Dave Page; Marc G. Fournier
> Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> Subject: RE: svr2/unionfs
>=20
> > > > Cool. So when can you do it? :-p
> > >=20
> > > Not today :)
> > >=20
> > > If you want to send me a reminder, how about Wednesday?
> >=20
> > Sounds good, thanks.=20
> >=20
> > Magnus (or anyone else); any problems with that?
> >=20
> > Will mean a little downtime of wwwmaster and techdocs....
>=20
> Works for me - tough I probably won't be able to help out all=20
> that much.
>=20
>=20
> Depending on how long it is, do we want to kick downloads off to a
> hardcoded mirror during the update (will require syncing with=20
> the static
> mirrors, of course), or just live with it?
>=20
> (Since during the downtime, nobody will be able to download off the
> website)

Hmm, that's a good point. Marc; any idea how long the downtime is likely
to be? I'm not sure what the best way to redirect the clients will be
unless we temporarily write a static version of the few hundred or so
mirror selection pages.

/D