X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040CED1B345; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 21:27:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77623-03; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 00:27:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lerami.lerctr.org (lerami.lerctr.org [192.147.25.11]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1F4D1B233; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 21:27:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from lerami.lerctr.org ([192.147.25.11]) by lerami.lerctr.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BXqwa-0002OM-VV; Tue, 08 Jun 2004 19:27:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 19:27:52 -0500 (CDT) From: Larry Rosenman To: Josh Berkus Cc: "Bort, Paul" , pgsql-www@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal In-Reply-To: <200402271105.02335.josh@agliodbs.com> Message-ID: References: <735D404BD9E7EB44B9CDFC27FC88809B01C4D526@mail2.tmwsystems.com> <200402271105.02335.josh@agliodbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200406/38 X-Sequence-Number: 4540 On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Josh Berkus wrote: > Paul, > >> Your main concern about RT isn't true, at least here at my office. I >> installed RT, with no prior experience with any OSS tracker, back in >> October, and it worked on PostgreSQL the first time. (PostgreSQL support was >> one of the main reasons I chose it to track issues on my >> PostgreSQL/Perl-based webapp.) I made this point in an earlier post in this >> thread. There is no conversion effort needed with RT 3.0.6, it just works on >> PostgreSQL. > > My apologies, then! I was operating off of the statements of others, and the > fact that the only RT impelementations I've used were running on MySQL. So, > questions: > > 1) can you compare/contrast RT vs. BZ vs. Simplified bug-tracking, like > GForge? I can't help here, but... > > 2) What help, if any, would we be able to get in supporting RT from the RT > community? RT community is VERY good, the rt-users list is REAL good, and Jesse Vincent (the primary author) is VERY good about keeping PG support up to date, and making the improvements necessary. I run a RT on PG here as well. LER > > -- > -Josh Berkus > Aglio Database Solutions > San Francisco > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your > joining column's datatypes do not match > > -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749