public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
To: Melanie Plageman <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Pg Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Moving the vacuum GUCs' docs out of the Client Connection Defaults section
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 11:32:58 -0600
Message-ID: <Z31lSsdtgXj0mHii@nathan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAKRu_bz3BD4w0jmjfQkckAQE5eb-Ge2a=9Q-HG_rWSTeG_PzA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAKRu_aQUOaMYrcjNuXeSkJtaX9oRUzKP57bsYbC0gVVWS+cbA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAAKRu_bz3BD4w0jmjfQkckAQE5eb-Ge2a=9Q-HG_rWSTeG_PzA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 12:15:17PM -0500, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> This is my first docs patch that introduces new sections and such, so
> I'm not sure I got the indentation 100% correct (I, of course, tried
> to follow conventions).
I haven't reviewed the patch in depth, but I think it's worth considering
whether this change will break any links that work in one version but break
if you change the version number. I believe appendix-obsolete.sgml is
designed to help with that a bit, but I've had mixed results when I've
tried to use it. Of course, it's also possible that we don't care too
much...
But overall, consolidating the docs for the vacuum GUCs seems like a good
idea.
--
nathan
view thread (21+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Moving the vacuum GUCs' docs out of the Client Connection Defaults section
In-Reply-To: <Z31lSsdtgXj0mHii@nathan>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox