Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 19:51:33 +0200
From: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
To: "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Cc: Jimmy Angelakos <vyruss@hellug.gr>, pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org,
	PostgreSQL Contributors <contributors@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels
Message-ID: <aOlHpVpUCctIGPX7@msg.df7cb.de>
References: <aJ9ur1eSnk5pp9aD@msg.df7cb.de>
 <190A13D4-022B-4323-B30D-027B0D931DAF@hellug.gr>
 <aOj5NNxXdghSX66R@msg.df7cb.de>
 <29930b2f-bdb6-4a8f-beb1-e1179d821168@postgresql.org>
 <aOkeKbTAYhd8k6DT@msg.df7cb.de>
 <5e9c001f-7732-42eb-8cc2-1a26af842800@postgresql.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5e9c001f-7732-42eb-8cc2-1a26af842800@postgresql.org>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aOlHpVpUCctIGPX7%40msg.df7cb.de>
Precedence: bulk

Re: Jonathan S. Katz
> That's a fair point. That said, I'd weigh it against the confusion of the
> one-time action of promoting major contributors to "distinguished" vs. the
> confusion of parsing the difference between "major" vs.
> "significant"/"notable" or similar adjectives, where it's more challenging
> to understand the difference.

To fix that, we could rename Major to Distinguished and still go with
Significant for level 2. But I don't quite see the need.

Christoph