Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1v9r13-009d5S-EC for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 20:25:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1v9r12-0059SU-Dw for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 20:25:31 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1v9r12-0059S6-3V; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 20:25:31 +0000 Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.171]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1v9r0x-002LWk-2o; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 20:25:29 +0000 Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cpGXZ30ygz9tmn; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 22:25:18 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: outgoing_mbo_mout; dkim=none; spf=pass (outgoing_mbo_mout: domain of cb@df7cb.de designates 2001:67c:2050:b231:465::2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cb@df7cb.de Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 22:25:17 +0200 From: Christoph Berg To: Kai Wagner Cc: PostgreSQL WWW , PostgreSQL Contributors Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Contributor levels Message-ID: References: <190A13D4-022B-4323-B30D-027B0D931DAF@hellug.gr> <0914098bd753b0a190d46adf5fc26314@hellug.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4cpGXZ30ygz9tmn List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Re: Kai Wagner > Hi, > > maybe it's just me as a none native English speaker but Significant > resonates the most with me and makes sense between Major and just > contributor. Thanks everyone for the input. In the meantime I had also run a poll in the PostgreSQL social channel, and there as well, Significant won. So, the team has decided to go with * Major Contributor * Significant Contributor The plans for the 3rd level are becoming more and more concrete. (As said before, we will make sure that the existing 2 levels are clearly separated from that big pool.) Christoph