Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 13:55:05 +0200
From: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org>,
	PostgreSQL Contributors <contributors@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Badges moderation
Message-ID: <ae9OmSgCXrUtGNnb@msg.df7cb.de>
References: <ae86UXEmuRIjPAP-@msg.df7cb.de>
 <CABUevEyt59us_bULyDT+jwdEPULost_XZFYHSD_b2REkH9R12g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABUevEyt59us_bULyDT+jwdEPULost_XZFYHSD_b2REkH9R12g@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ae9OmSgCXrUtGNnb%40msg.df7cb.de>
Precedence: bulk

Re: Magnus Hagander
> Yeah, we can do that I think. But perhaps it's better to split it out so
> there can be multiple moderation teams, so that we can more flexibly add
> more people as needed?

Well, I don't know how easy that would be. Perhaps we could merge it
and do the split as a next step?

> And also just to be clear -- the last result of the discussion about this
> was that there were plenty of concerns about the suggested way to do it,
> wasn't it? Have I missed a discusison somewhere, or are those concerns
> still open?

The last result (from the lunch discussion in Brussels) was that we
need handling of retired people from "permanent" badges like "Sysadmin
Team". That's not included yet, but in the team, we concluded that
instead of some complicated date range handling (perhaps that's what
you remember as plenty?) we can just add a single boolean "retired"
flag. We don't have that yet, but that's not a big blocker.

Christoph