X-Original-To: pgsql-general-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C0A9DCD36
	for <pgsql-general-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:52:11 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 07808-02
	for <pgsql-general-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:52:08 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.197])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF869DCCB2
	for <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:52:05 -0400 (AST)
Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id k26so20513nfc
	for <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:52:05 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
	b=kG4V+PkMN1l1ZtjVsJwxR+Nuzcv6HvVfToOPKzvNRLAbSfCSyf2gm1wNUc9r2VGTCsTsZUSth5RVoPSFPrdWDFVvvAPem9AYqfFAntaGnrWlzmgwKH3f4C+V6rRwYWDYpxgExHQM89egpRJ3/KdlHKed9h9y6j9UX36ZF/TPzBQ=
Received: by 10.48.255.20 with SMTP id c20mr49840nfi;
	Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:52:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.48.226.5 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:52:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <b8fe89530511301052l1b8fa35aicc02f268d888e97@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:52:05 -0800
From: Joshua Drake <linuxpoet@gmail.com>
To: "Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>
Subject: Re: What is the deal with mailing lists?
Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>,
	"Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>,
	PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
In-Reply-To: <20051130182200.GH13642@nasby.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_4388_24673635.1133376725539"
References: <438DE0BA.1050705@commandprompt.com>
	<20051130182200.GH13642@nasby.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200511/1403
X-Sequence-Number: 87546

------=_Part_4388_24673635.1133376725539
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

>
>
> It looks like it took a total of 7:20 for that email to make it to me.
> In a case of pot calling kettle black ;P, it took your machine 5:58 to
> get it to postgresql.org. Of course that's assuming everyone's clock is
> in sync, and the clock on the machine you sent the email from appears to
> be 13 minutes fast.
>
> Anyway, next time you're seeing a delay take a look at the headers and
> see if you can pin down what the bottleneck is.


Thank you for that... except that, I was talking about HOUR[n] delays not 1=
3
minutes.
As stated in the original email, I am having reports of emails taking much,
much longer
then 13 minutes and in fact for some odd reason, I still don't have your
reply in my jd@cmd
mailbox.

My current last email from the list was 3 hours and twenty minutes ago but
the archives already
have them, as does gmail. If this was just me that was having this problem
it would be one thing
and easily diagnosable (in theory) but it isn't. There are others.

Joshua D. Drake





--
> Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
> Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
> vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>

------=_Part_4388_24673635.1133376725539
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

<div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(=
204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>It looks=
 like it took a total of 7:20 for that email to make it to me.<br>In a case=
 of pot calling kettle black ;P, it took your machine 5:58 to
<br>get it to <a href=3D"http://postgresql.org">postgresql.org</a>. Of cour=
se that's assuming everyone's clock is<br>in sync, and the clock on the mac=
hine you sent the email from appears to<br>be 13 minutes fast.<br><br>Anywa=
y, next time you're seeing a delay take a look at the headers and
<br>see if you can pin down what the bottleneck is.</blockquote><div><br>
Thank you for that... except that, I was talking about HOUR[n] delays not 1=
3 minutes.<br>
As stated in the original email, I am having reports of emails taking much,=
 much longer<br>
then 13 minutes and in fact for some odd reason, I still don't have your re=
ply in my jd@cmd<br>
mailbox.<br>
<br>
My current last email from the list was 3 hours and twenty minutes ago but =
the archives already<br>
have them, as does gmail. If this was just me that was having this problem =
it would be one thing<br>
and easily diagnosable (in theory) but it isn't. There are others.<br>
<br>
Joshua D. Drake<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
&nbsp;</div><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px=
 solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">-=
-<br>Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=
&nbsp;<a href=3D"mailto:jnasby@pervasive.com">
jnasby@pervasive.com</a><br>Pervasive Software&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp=
;&nbsp;<a href=3D"http://pervasive.com">http://pervasive.com</a>&nbsp;&nbsp=
;&nbsp;&nbsp;work: 512-231-6117<br>vcard: <a href=3D"http://jim.nasby.net/p=
ervasive.vcf">http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf</a>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; cell: 512-569-9461<br><br>------------=
---------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------<br>TIP 6: expl=
ain analyze is your friend<br></blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_4388_24673635.1133376725539--