X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08602D1B431 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:22:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78799-04 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:21:36 -0400 (AST) Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60062D1B433 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:21:30 -0400 (AST) Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72]) by news.hub.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAQHLZNu092618 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:21:35 GMT (envelope-from news@news.hub.org) Received: (from news@localhost) by news.hub.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hAQHHbII091850 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:17:37 GMT From: "nobody" X-Newsgroups: comp.databases.postgresql.hackers Subject: Re: Build farm Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:17:26 -0000 Organization: Hub.Org Networking Services Lines: 61 Message-ID: References: <23062.1069440468@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200311241014.48813.jm@poure.com> <3FC1FFA5.9030003@dunslane.net> X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.hub.org X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200311/1504 X-Sequence-Number: 47791 Just a thought. You could also run the regression test automatically after a successful build? "Andrew Dunstan" wrote in message news:3FC1FFA5.9030003@dunslane.net... > > > Jean-Michel POURE wrote: > > >Le Vendredi 21 Novembre 2003 19:47, Tom Lane a écrit : > > > > > >>I think the main value of a build farm is that we'd get nearly immediate > >>feedback about the majority of simple porting problems. Your previous > >>arguments that it wouldn't smoke everything out are certainly valid --- > >>but we wouldn't abandon the regression tests just because they don't > >>find everything. Immediate feedback is good because a patch can be > >>fixed while it's still fresh in the author's mind. > >> > >> > > > >Dear friends, > > > >We have a small build farm for pgAdmin covering Win32, FreeBSD and most GNU/ > >Linux systems. See http://www.pgadmin.org/pgadmin3/download.php#snapshots > > > >The advantage are immediate feedback and correction of problems. Also, in a > >release cycle, developers and translators are quite motivated to see their > >work published fast. > > > >Of course, it is always hard to "mesure" the real impact of a build farm. My > >opinion it that it is quite positive, as it helps tighten the links between > >people, which is free software is mostly about. > > > > > > > > Right. But I think we have been talking about using the build farm to do > test builds rather than to provide snapshots. I'd be very wary of > providing arbitrary snapshots of postgres, whereas I'd be prepared to > try a snapshot of pgadmin3 under certain circumstances. (Also, building > your own snapshot of postgres is somewhat easier than building your own > snapshot of pgadmin3). > > cheers > > andrew > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >