From: Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith@pooteeweet.org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL rebranding
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:12:49 +0200
Organization: Hub.Org Networking Services
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <egrcre$2198$1@news.hub.org>
References: <44F55F67.6030407@cheapcomplexdevices.com>
	<200608301824.k7UIO6k21646@momjian.us>
	<44F6A817.8050301@pooteeweet.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
In-Reply-To: <44F6A817.8050301@pooteeweet.org>
To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org

Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Should we have this information on our web site somewhere?
> 
> I just added an initial version of a list on the new wiki. There is 
> still plenty missing as I just wanted to get something up there quickly:
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php/pgwiki:Variations

Ok finally had time to work on this some more .. this time on my own wiki:
http://oss.backendmedia.com/RDBMS/PgSQLVariants

I am not sure on some of the information (especially licenses). Also I 
am not sure what other relevant information should be on there. Maybe a 
separate column for the company name or a column with information on the 
availability (from when til when the db was available). Maybe there are 
some variants missing?

Please just add a comment on the wiki or reply here and I will add it to 
the table. If someone points me that the necessary steps to get this 
list added to the official site I would also be willing to write the 
necessary patch.

regards,
Lukas