X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F72A9DD742 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:41:08 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07830-04 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:41:07 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.192]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489C69DD717 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:40:59 -0400 (AST) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s2so73730uge for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:41:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=dhpWO0F1FpGNlPkJub1SjH4Eo0v9ljNDLcpaEIwjMSTUrMcaduqWPOFU9HYxs0Ojn96xgSCGGI6lLME9F07dHnbVg+n2keJF5WdGKe/qtKycnGq4ed+s4Z7VVQkig+9sdptN+ovrixn1lyNTgSQtMLx4m9Ga6t3hxwjxF9LRDiw= Received: by 10.49.54.3 with SMTP id g3mr109876nfk; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:41:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.108.20 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:41:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:41:02 +0000 From: Guido Barosio To: josh@agliodbs.com Subject: Re: Domain conference.postgresql.org requested Cc: Dave Page , "Marc G. Fournier" , pgsql-www@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <200601131403.27567.josh@agliodbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_19299_938745.1137192062031" References: <200601131403.27567.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.706 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.705, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] X-Spam-Score: 0.706 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/88 X-Sequence-Number: 9276 ------=_Part_19299_938745.1137192062031 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Well, I am probably missing too much (dunno about the tech resources and cost for the case), and you will probably be surprised on my post to the thread, but: 1) conference.postgresql.org seems much more easy to remember than www.postg.... (which has no sense if the site is temporary) 2) Google (and alike ones) will obviously index this documents, so, if *we* set this as a subdomain, and then will switch it off, we'll have 404 GET shit, when, if *we* use a www.postgre..../conference kind of site, then we could easily redirect those hits to the main site, without paying an extra for a subdomain. My 2 cents, if they count go to the site/conference case. Every little helps, and please avoid this post if I am being silly >:} G.- On 1/13/06, Josh Berkus wrote: > > Dave, > > > Good point. Well, it is a temporary site so having it separate for good > > reasons is not so evil I don't think. If you're convinced it needs to b= e > > separate, > > Well, that's what Peter, Andrew and Gavin S voted. > > > then all I would suggest is that you make obviously a separate > > site, yet clearly still PostgreSQL. Perhaps stick rigidly with the main > > site colours and logo, but use a totally different layout. Or the same > > layout, but different colours. That would help with your point below. > > Gavin Roy is preparing a template for Framewerk that's the PostgreSQL.org > "theme". So it will look like part of the site, just with different > navigation. > > -- > --Josh > > Josh Berkus > Aglio Database Solutions > San Francisco > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match > -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign . \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . X - NO Word docs in e-mail . / \ ----------------------------------------------------------------- ------=_Part_19299_938745.1137192062031 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Well, I am probably missing too much (dunno about the tech resources a= nd cost for the case), and you will probably be surprised on my post to the= thread, but:
 
1) conference.postgresql.= org seems much more easy to remember than = www.postg.... (which has no sense if the site is temporary)
 
2) Google (and alike ones) will obviously index this documents, so, if= *we* set this as a subdomain, and then will switch it off, we'll have 404 = GET shit, when, if *we* use a www.postgre..../conference kind of site, then we could easily redirect = those hits to the main site, without paying an extra for a subdomain.
 
My 2 cents, if they count go to the site/conference case.
 
Every little helps, and please avoid this post if I am being silly >= ;:}
 
G.-

 
On 1/13/06, = Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com<= /a>> wrote:
Dave,

> Good point. We= ll, it is a temporary site so having it separate for good
> reasons i= s not so evil I don't think. If you're convinced it needs to be
> separate,

Well, that's what Peter, Andrew and Gavin S voted= .

> then all I would suggest is that you make obviously a separat= e
> site, yet clearly still PostgreSQL. Perhaps stick rigidly with th= e main
> site colours and logo, but use a totally different layout. Or the = same
> layout, but different colours. That would help with your point= below.

Gavin Roy is preparing a template for Framewerk that's the= =20 PostgreSQL.org
"theme".   So it will look like part = of the site, just with different
navigation.

--
--Josh

= Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

-----------= ----------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to      choose an index scan if your joining c= olumn's datatypes do not
      match



--
/"\   ASCI= I Ribbon Campaign  .
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail  .
X  - NO Word docs= in e-mail .
/ \ -------------------------------------------------------= ----------=20 ------=_Part_19299_938745.1137192062031--