Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gk5Xw-0005O8-0g for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 11:09:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gk5Xu-0002qL-JB for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 11:09:14 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gk5Xt-0002qE-Hy for pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 11:09:14 +0000 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gk5Xq-0004La-1f; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 11:09:13 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24FB9237EE; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 06:09:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 06:09:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tapoueh.org; h= from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=XfpcqY1G9WpQ2AHb9MkSJ6E eVugpgaY2/QS7YazcwJo=; b=CL/gWLd+V+y8UoZWPNpIfvj0JOqNkdG1zyrk0a4 jkpnQebiKXcYeTlk8MhNxL8DWOh85lLF8BC524QIcQnlUEHj6gDPmDByPU7ZkrMz zZ+yB9ungJTcgNKlXGYahi/gqBbBTpurs/di9yBRJRQhOp65zFm++z9IXwfTAtdQ Vqj0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=XfpcqY 1G9WpQ2AHb9MkSJ6EeVugpgaY2/QS7YazcwJo=; b=yGEXyHEw5PSFjBxLRHq2Sb 86prTs0iRvoV6mFIDeuyjVVId/C4y6vHSAMYZ0fTFxtfpFNTNbZlP3L+KByWsS0P 4OWUN9D0eZMMh9Q8FufEgoqGFPRgbMVDbnCP5QFE5Eyyacb79vuoabIJdYo9O1Ap auUcslBo7gVuj7BTuuIlV2n8OsDqhXWu/ezFu+/HmvkfNoywk4zd/kA46xfEYAth +PDPP5xs1F5vGcnoSKOU87d9yVfQnQraRzdk/s8JQ7Wf2zYngK6Z/fZQYEmpQZKB k70R6kkzev/Lr0rfHrH1nMEmDlSExiWkQ2qfqB0A7h+w32ItnfayI4LcS10rT1KQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrgeekgddujecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedt tdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvufhofhffjg fkfgggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomhepffhimhhithhrihcuhfhonhhtrghinhgv uceoughimhesthgrphhouhgvhhdrohhrgheqnecukfhppeekkedrudeluddrgedtrdduvd ehnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeguihhmsehtrghpohhuvghhrdhorhhgnecu vehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from Dimitris-MacBook-Pro.local (unknown [88.191.40.125]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2A75A100BA; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 06:09:06 -0500 (EST) From: Dimitri Fontaine To: Alvaro Herrera Cc: Stephen Frost , Andres Freund , Magnus Hagander , "Jonathan S. Katz" , PostgreSQL WWW Subject: Re: mailing list redirect for bug numbers? Organization: Citus Data References: <201901162154.tg6vsmfylacs@alvherre.pgsql> User-Mail-Address: dim@tapoueh.org Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:09:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <201901162154.tg6vsmfylacs@alvherre.pgsql> (Alvaro Herrera's message of "Wed, 16 Jan 2019 18:54:40 -0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Alvaro Herrera writes: > With bug numbers, the situation is the same: if, while offline, you have > a commit message carrying a bug number, and an offline mailbox where > pgsql-bugs threads are tagged with the same bug numbers, it's easy to > look up the thread based only on the contents of the commit message. If > you have to contact a web interface to figure out what the thread is, > that workflow fails. Is it possible to add custom email headers in the pglister system, something like maybe X-PostgreSQL-Bug, so that the bug ID number is clearly assigned to emails? Such a system might also be backwards compatible when backfilling bug numbers to threads that don't have them yet. Local archives will need to be synced again of course, but then it's easy to grep for the X-PostgreSQL-Bug and find the email thread again, right? Regards, -- dim