Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([98.129.198.125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TNoJl-0007I3-PD for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:19:05 +0000 Received: from 30.55.colo.spiretech.net ([69.168.55.30] helo=lists.commandprompt.com) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TNoJf-0003AY-HR for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:19:04 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.5] (spinlock.commandprompt.com [69.168.55.30]) by lists.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 008D537C; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 10:18:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.5] ([68.118.161.194] helo=[192.168.1.5]) by assp.commandprompt.com with ESMTPS(AES256-SHA) (2.1.1); 15 Oct 2012 10:18:57 -0700 Message-ID: <507C457F.2070700@commandprompt.com> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 10:18:55 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Nash CC: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: WebSphere Application Server support for postgres References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Assp-Version: 2.1.1(11364) on assp.commandprompt.com X-Assp-Client-SSL: yes X-Assp-ID: assp.commandprompt.com m1-21537-13078 X-Assp-Envelope-From: jd@commandprompt.com X-Assp-Intended-For: postgres.dba.needs.help@gmail.com X-Assp-Original-Subject: Re: [GENERAL] WebSphere Application Server support for postgres X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201210/463 X-Sequence-Number: 191431 On 10/15/2012 01:22 AM, John Nash wrote: > > Hi, There is no reason to email all the lists. Removing ones that aren't required. You are just going to irritate everyone. > > Our IT Company systems architecture is based on IBM Websphere > Application Server, we would like to migrate our databases to > Postgres, the main problem which stops us from doing that is Postgres > is not supported by IBM Websphere Application Server. Sure it is. I have clients that use it. IBM just doesn't want you to use it, they would rather charge you. All you need is a JDBC driver and we have that. Now if you are saying IBM doesn't officially support Postgres, that is an entirely different argument. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC @cmdpromptinc - 509-416-6579