From: fluca1978 at infinito.it (Luca Ferrari)
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:59:00 +0100
Subject: [Pljava-dev] pljava @ itpug (italy) 2010
In-Reply-To: <4D062D22.8090409@tada.se>
References: <201012130834.13591.fluca1978@infinito.it>
	<201012131437.12442.fluca1978@infinito.it>
	<4D062D22.8090409@tada.se>
Message-ID: <201012131559.00982.fluca1978@infinito.it>

On Monday, December 13, 2010 03:26:42 pm Thomas Hallgren's cat walking on the 
keyboard wrote:
> Hi Luca,
> 
> Wouldn't it be better to manage distributed transactions in the middle tier
> on top of it all? After all, you are already *in* a transaction when you
> execute your PL/Java code and that's a transaction that you cannot connect
> other resources to.
> 
> When writing PL/Java, I did not intend for distributed transactions to be
> orchestrated from within it for sure. That's not a recommended use-case.
> In fact, I would strongly advice against it.


So did I! And this is what I answered, but I was curious to know if it was 
correct at all.

Thanks,
Luca