From: hal.hildebrand at me.com (Hal Hildebrand)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:08:01 -0800
Subject: [Pljava-dev] Building pljava.so with maven-nar-plugin?
In-Reply-To: <51192B8B.6020305@tada.se>
References: <20130111204013.00e19939@james.intern>
 <20130112234738.03b606b1@james.intern> <50F29266.5070408@tada.se>
 <50F29372.7080808@tada.se> <20130206023102.1b94cc01@james.intern>
 <51120BE7.6020109@tada.se> <20130207170645.080294f4@james.intern>
 <20130208015920.58709bae@james.intern> <20130211034102.740dcda8@james.intern>
 <5118873A.1090802@tada.se> <20130211154634.0b906b8d@james.intern>
 <51192B8B.6020305@tada.se>
Message-ID: <2DCCAC9E-2F7B-4F09-A268-7C334CED3378@me.com>

I have two repos. The first was my original fork. The one I'm working from is a fork from the official pljava github repo. My fork is https://github.com/Hellblazer/pljava-1

Sent from my Tricorder

On Feb 11, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Thomas Hallgren <thomas at tada.se> wrote:

> On 2013-02-11 15:46, Christian Hammers wrote:
>> Hi
>> 
>> I just did so!
>> 
>> I noticed tough that your repository still has a module "pljava" with
>> uncompilable Java sources. It seems that I based my repo on the
>> Hellblazer fork. It's propably better if you go through his commits and
>> apply them one by one as they contain lots of code changes.
> Which of Hellblazers forks did you use? I received (and accepted) a pull-request from Hellblazer about a month ago.
> 
> - thomas
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pljava-dev mailing list
> Pljava-dev at pgfoundry.org
> http://lists.pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pljava-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pljava-dev/attachments/20130211/dfbe0ee1/attachment.html>