X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B529F11F6767 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:27:44 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05977-03-8 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:27:39 -0400 (AST) Received: from svr4.postgresql.org (svr4.postgresql.org [66.98.251.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CFB11F676E for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:27:38 -0400 (AST) Received: from tada.se (1-1-2-48a.rny.sth.bostream.se [82.182.133.12]) by svr4.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C8B5AFAFA for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 19:21:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unverified [127.0.0.1]) by tada.se (SurgeMail 3.7a) with ESMTP id 5656 for multiple; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:21:11 +0200 Message-ID: <44298CA7.3030000@tada.se> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:21:11 +0200 From: Thomas Hallgren User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Cramer Cc: Simon Riggs , Tom Lane , Martijn van Oosterhout , PostgreSQL-development , PL/Java Development Subject: Re: Shared memory References: <4423CF32.3060406@tada.se> <20060324125851.GC8718@svana.org> <4427A8F1.3020009@tada.se> <14559.1143473507@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4428125D.7000707@tada.se> <1143541439.3839.323.camel@localhost.localdomain> <44295AB0.5060203@tada.se> <2606EB97-424C-4C15-A3F6-AED510E5B37F@fastcrypt.com> In-Reply-To: <2606EB97-424C-4C15-A3F6-AED510E5B37F@fastcrypt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=849097733 X-Authenticated-User: thomas@tada.se X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.103 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.103] X-Spam-Score: 0.103 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200603/1198 X-Sequence-Number: 81596 Dave Cramer wrote: > > What exactly is a FENCED solution ? If it is simply a remote > connection to a single JVM then pl-j already does that. Last time I tried to use pl-j (in order to build a mutual test platform), I didn't manage to make it compile due to missing artifacts and it wasn't ported to Windows. Lazslo filed a JIRA bug on that but since then (August last year) I've seen no activity in the project. Is it still alive? Is anyone using it? Regards, Thomas Hallgren