agora inbox for pljava-dev@postgresql.orghelp / color / mirror / Atom feed
[Pljava-dev] Followup, regarding ResultSet _new in triggers and Tada Wiki 2+ messages / 0 participants [nested] [flat]
* [Pljava-dev] Followup, regarding ResultSet _new in triggers and Tada Wiki @ 2006-10-18 11:38 2006-10-18 19:13 ` [Pljava-dev] Followup, regarding ResultSet _new in triggers and Tada Wiki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: @ 2006-10-18 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw) Btw, the pljava wiki has been down the last couple days: (http://wiki.tada.se/wiki/display/pljava/Triggers for example) I had mentioned in my previous message about closing the _new ResultSet (from TriggerData.getNew()) to try to stop my slow memory leak problem. Turns out that actually prevented my updateObjects from taking affect - so I took it back out, assuming we are not supposed to close that ResultSet. From the examples it looked like that was the intended behaviour anyways -- not to close _new. -Mark ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
* [Pljava-dev] Followup, regarding ResultSet _new in triggers and Tada Wiki 2006-10-18 11:38 [Pljava-dev] Followup, regarding ResultSet _new in triggers and Tada Wiki @ 2006-10-18 19:13 ` 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: @ 2006-10-18 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw) Mark Mitchell wrote: > Btw, the pljava wiki has been down the last couple days: > > (http://wiki.tada.se/wiki/display/pljava/Triggers for example) > Thanks for pointing it out. It's up and running again now. > I had mentioned in my previous message about closing the _new > ResultSet (from TriggerData.getNew()) to try to stop my slow memory > leak problem. Turns out that actually prevented my updateObjects from > taking affect - so I took it back out, assuming we are not supposed to > close that ResultSet. From the examples it looked like that was the > intended behaviour anyways -- not to close _new. > > Right, neither the new nor the old are supposed to be closed. They are not real result sets. I just chose that interface since it was the most suitable for accessing the row. I bet there's something in the underlying implementation that forgets to free up some memory in the native C code. Kind Regards, Thomas Hallgren ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-18 19:13 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2006-10-18 11:38 [Pljava-dev] Followup, regarding ResultSet _new in triggers and Tada Wiki 2006-10-18 19:13 `
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox