agora inbox for pljava-dev@postgresql.orghelp / color / mirror / Atom feed
[Pljava-dev] Release? 3+ messages / 0 participants [nested] [flat]
* [Pljava-dev] Release? @ 2007-10-10 23:21 2007-10-11 20:55 ` [Pljava-dev] Release? 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: @ 2007-10-10 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw) Hi all I've been having a bit of a play with PL/Java, and would like to help out getting a release or at least prerelease compatible with PostgreSQL 8.2/8.3beta out the door. Running code out of the PL/Java CVS repository, Ive been able to successfully run the included tester against pgsql 8.2.5 and CVS HEAD, on Windows, Linux and Solaris x86. So the code looks in reasonable shape. Given that 8.3 has now hit beta, this seems like a prime time to package up something for users to play with. What do people think? Btw, despite the internal JDBC driver not supporting the new JDBC 4 methods, it is possible to compile the code against a JDK 1.4.2/1.5 and then point to a 1.6 JRE at runtime. All the tests pass, with the exception of the DatabaseMetaData test, which then passes when the attached patch is applied to MetaDataBooleans.java. If there is agreement on packaging a release/prerelease up, I can make binaries available for the above listed platform/pgsql combinations, although I won't be able to upload them to pgfoundry as I won't have admin rights to do so. Incidentally, is there any reason the mailing list and CVS repository haven't moved to pgfoundry? Cheers Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: MetaDataBooleans.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 649 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pljava-dev/attachments/20071011/6cb3d472/attachment.obj; ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* [Pljava-dev] Release? 2007-10-10 23:21 [Pljava-dev] Release? @ 2007-10-11 20:55 ` 2007-10-12 10:57 ` [Pljava-dev] Release? 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: @ 2007-10-11 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw) On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Tom Dunstan wrote: > Running code out of the PL/Java CVS repository, Ive been able to > successfully run the included tester against pgsql 8.2.5 and CVS HEAD, > on Windows, Linux and Solaris x86. So the code looks in reasonable > shape. Given that 8.3 has now hit beta, this seems like a prime time > to package up something for users to play with. What do people think? I don't think there are any more development plans, so now sounds like a good time to me. I can update the version numbers, but Thomas is the only who can upload things to pgfoundry. > Btw, despite the internal JDBC driver not supporting the new JDBC 4 > methods, it is possible to compile the code against a JDK 1.4.2/1.5 > and then point to a 1.6 JRE at runtime. All the tests pass, with the > exception of the DatabaseMetaData test, which then passes when the > attached patch is applied to MetaDataBooleans.java. Applied. > If there is agreement on packaging a release/prerelease up, I can make > binaries available for the above listed platform/pgsql combinations, > although I won't be able to upload them to pgfoundry as I won't have > admin rights to do so. Your build help is appreciated as I just lost my windows build machine. > Incidentally, is there any reason the mailing list and CVS repository > haven't moved to pgfoundry? > Setting up a new lists can be done, but moving over subscribers and archives is something that gborg/pgfoundry admins would need to do. Same thing for CVS, we can import current sources, but to get history we need help. Kris Jurka ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* [Pljava-dev] Release? 2007-10-10 23:21 [Pljava-dev] Release? 2007-10-11 20:55 ` [Pljava-dev] Release? @ 2007-10-12 10:57 ` 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: @ 2007-10-12 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw) Kris Jurka wrote: > I don't think there are any more development plans, so now sounds like a > good time to me. I can update the version numbers, but Thomas is the only > who can upload things to pgfoundry. > Ah, sorry about that Kris. You are hereby added as a Senior Developer on the PgFoundry PL/Java project. >> Incidentally, is there any reason the mailing list and CVS repository >> haven't moved to pgfoundry? >> > > Setting up a new lists can be done, but moving over subscribers and > archives is something that gborg/pgfoundry admins would need to do. Same > thing for CVS, we can import current sources, but to get history we need > help. > I've had discussions with the people behind GBorg several times about this. They wanted to move PL/Java and I told them what I'd like to have moved (CVS and mailinglist, nothing more). But then I guess nobody had time to actually do it. I'm all for moving it. Ideally, I'd like to move over to SVN at the same time. - thomas ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-12 10:57 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2007-10-10 23:21 [Pljava-dev] Release? 2007-10-11 20:55 ` 2007-10-12 10:57 `
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox