From: eric.kolotyluk at gmail.com (Eric Kolotyluk)
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 22:44:12 -0700
Subject: [Pljava-dev] Windows 64bit: Call for further testing
In-Reply-To: <op.vuxx9bieuxs6vk@localhost>
References: <op.vuvgs8bvuxs6vk@localhost>
	<DUB101-w327CAA6ABEB33C945BDED4D39F0@phx.gbl>	<op.vuv30ajduxs6vk@localhost>
	<op.vuv7fgojuxs6vk@localhost>	<DUB101-w5FF98CC86588307D8F69CD39E0@phx.gbl>
	<4DC00C3D.2080401@gmail.com>
	<op.vuwwtofquxs6vk@localhost>	<4DC05865.6000002@gmail.com>
	<op.vuxx9bieuxs6vk@localhost>
Message-ID: <4DC0E7AC.6030203@gmail.com>

Both build01 and build02 seem to work fine for me :-)

Wha-Hoo!

Awesome, you did it Johann - way to go.

DependencyWalker is still complaining about IEFRAME.DLL, but the 
important thing is the pljava.dll seems to be working now.

I still have to do further testing with my actual Java code however, but 
it's almost bed time so I will have to work on that tomorrow.

Cheers, Eric

On 2011-05-03 10:16 PM, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
> On Tue, 03 May 2011 19:32:53 -0000, Eric Kolotyluk 
> <eric.kolotyluk at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> OK, after adding the other missing DLLs, when I try to run 
>> install.sql I get
>>
>> ERROR: incompatible library "C:/Program Files 
>> (Open)/Kodak/Intersystem/Postgres/lib/pljava.dll": missing magic block
>>
>> That is actually something I have not seen before.
>
> This means the server is resolving all dependencies and loading the
> DLL.  This error is my fault and has been fixed in TEST-build0x-...,
> using naming convention based on John's suggestion.
>
> I'm curious to know which or both of the build01 and build02 files
> work?  I used different methods of symbol exporting for these builds.
>
>