From: thomas at tada.se (Thomas Hallgren) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:50:43 +0100 Subject: [Pljava-dev] Compatibility with Java 1.7 and PostgreSQL 9.2? Is this project still alive? In-Reply-To: <50F007DD.7090600@2ndQuadrant.com> References: <20130110232746.105a633d@james.intern> <622891DB-3ED6-4A37-BDD0-169321496E14@me.com> <50EFBDC4.7070309@tada.se> <50EFEBC6.3040803@tada.se> <50F007DD.7090600@2ndQuadrant.com> Message-ID: <50F018B3.8010200@tada.se> On 2013-01-11 13:38, Craig Ringer wrote: > On 01/11/2013 06:39 PM, Thomas Hallgren wrote: >> On 2013-01-11 01:48, Hal Hildebrand wrote: >>>> I have a git hub fork where I've worked through these Java 1.6 issues. >>>> >>>> https://github.com/Hellblazer/pljava > I'm a bit worried by the changelog on that. The changes to make > failures silent, in particular, are not something I am at all > comfortable with, especially as they appear to be a workaround for an > ORM or other intermediary. If they're going to be there, surely they > should be conditional? "notsupportederror={log|throw|ignore}" ? > Looking closer at the changes, I wasn't too thrilled about that part either. Making it conditional seems to be a very good idea. > The sources and build look like they would benefit from a clean-up, so > that seems like a good idea - but what's this change going to do to > Windows build support? > Seems some work remain to the the native parts building. Perhaps we could establish a decent process around this at GitHub? I.e. we use pljava/pjlava as the base where we enter issues and submit pull-requests? I'm not at all against adding collaborators to the actual project either if that would speed up reviews and acceptance of contributions. Anyone who wants to help, please raise a hand. Regards, Thomas Hallgren -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: