Subject: Re: PL/Java new build plugin
To: Kartik Ohri <kartikohri13@gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAASLQ4Mva7dAXiS_c9OLhV4VzNHF=XNKJosuS5gtZTB6b4TW1Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <5F0F2DA2.5090603@anastigmatix.net>
 <CAASLQ4N40xn-0S4Nsy0Ld75=Ny719MPUE7_aRP_5nAcAqkAqoQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAASLQ4OiWCQQwYFnxAQBe2dC6Ms803RjCMX-9AC2=1m0ZzeDhA@mail.gmail.com>
 <5F12FF49.6090906@anastigmatix.net> <5F12FF80.5020208@anastigmatix.net>
 <CAASLQ4MqSVnhK_GMgq03HcmOKk7a-v7b4L0yfPbtRO=mpqoQtA@mail.gmail.com>
 <5F1338F8.6030506@anastigmatix.net>
 <CAASLQ4OR8ZD4GRNHVGuTzJp_UP-PAcADxcz=uymiSFPpg8EEHQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5F135B84.8070302@anastigmatix.net>
 <CAASLQ4O=tYGASWB6F+PTiB2L3RbmHcVX8XAbKHyhwBDOodH1zg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAASLQ4P=c42e342-1YTTCBxA=CKBH2m=DLJN+ZQb5EJW6MyofQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAASLQ4NU3BgfCnVxvAbu9vK9+gtPT87xX1uBj57b0y2J6nxi+Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <5F14C34E.4020704@anastigmatix.net> <5F14E15A.4040202@anastigmatix.net>
 <CAASLQ4PjzGVCj559r60Kw7i3uRUTzJraxBSDDsNtAt8v8_-oWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5F1664C5.2070700@anastigmatix.net>
 <CAASLQ4PeivyN6DkBPbgYTZmoqoOVdCDwinDFrREsXqZi2HQnWg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: pljava-dev@lists.postgresql.org
From: Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>
Message-ID: <5F1735ED.6020707@anastigmatix.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:37:33 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAASLQ4PeivyN6DkBPbgYTZmoqoOVdCDwinDFrREsXqZi2HQnWg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 07/21/20 14:03, Kartik Ohri wrote:
>>> It is possible to have this syntax. We need to specify an executionID in
>>> the executionBlock for that. In the plugin, we can get the entire
>>> configuration XML as a Plexus Xpp3Dom object from which we can retrieve
>> the
>>> attribute from any element. I'll add this. What attribute should be used
>>> though mimetype or engine or allow both and give engine precedence over
>>> mimetype ?
>>
> There is one caveat though. This means we need to hard code the executionID
> in the mojo. It might be problematic when we specify multiple execution
> blocks for different phases. But I am not sure how that works, is a new
> Mojo instance initiated for each execution if there are multiple ones since
> each execution block has its own configuration block?

Hmm. That does sound worrisome. And I don't, at present, know the answer
on instantiation; I would assume different executions are distinct instances.

I have just had one of those déjà vu moments of thinking "wait, haven't
I wondered about this before?" and it seems I did, five years ago (which
I guess is long enough to forget).

https://stackoverflow.com/a/32800814/4062350

Is it possible to declare the script parameter as a PlexusConfiguration?
Does that lead anywhere useful?

Regards,
-Chap