From: hal.hildebrand at me.com (Hal Hildebrand)
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 14:15:54 -0800
Subject: [Pljava-dev] Source code move to Git
In-Reply-To: <50F30C5A.9060407@tada.se>
References: <50F27A01.2090003@tada.se>
	<A2FF70FC-EE5D-4F43-ACE8-A6F73366E314@me.com>
	<50F2FAEA.6090809@tada.se> <50F30C5A.9060407@tada.se>
Message-ID: <8480FE88-E1AA-43EB-A5D1-6B155FA4BC55@me.com>

Oddly enough, I also created a maven plugin for pljava. 

Sent from my Tricorder

On Jan 13, 2013, at 11:34 AM, Thomas Hallgren <thomas at tada.se> wrote:

> On 2013-01-13 19:20, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
>> On 2013-01-13 18:10, Hal Hildebrand wrote:
>>> Is the break out of the maven modules acceptable?
>> 
>> Yes, although I'd prefer if the module named 'jdbc' was named 'plugin' or 'module'
> 
> On second thought, 'plugin' is a bad name. We might want to create a maven plug-in for pljava at some point. What about 'server' to signify that this is the part that runs in the server?
> 
> - thomas