public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: David Gradwell <[email protected]>
To: Kartik Ohri <[email protected]>
To: Chapman Flack <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Starting build-system work (Windows/Mac users please speak up)
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 08:14:36 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAASLQ4N0waxE9JKXjcLD=oAYz8NdgVAjBQd7FWGkuCOghFy8ng@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<CAASLQ4N0waxE9JKXjcLD=oAYz8NdgVAjBQd7FWGkuCOghFy8ng@mail.gmail.com>
I would include Java 1.8 (e.g. recent build such as jdk1.8.0_221.
This is because some capabilities of NetBeans (e.g. Native packaging) still require running under Java 1.8.
Regards
David
From: Kartik Ohri <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, 21 May 2020 at 07:48
To: Chapman Flack <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Starting build-system work (Windows/Mac users please speak up)
== PostgreSQL versions to build for
Also, the newer branch targets a narrower range of PostgreSQL versions.
The obvious starting point would be the versions currently shown as
'supported' in the PostgreSQL versioning policy:
https://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/ i.e., 12 back to 9.5.
The branch may build successfully for a couple of versions before 9.5.
I know the 'validator' PR knocked out pre-9.0 versions. When it comes
time to announce PL/Java 1.6, we might choose to say it works back
to PG 9.4, 9.3, or 9.2, if it works for those releases without extra fuss.
9.2 is a good stopping place, because the REL1_5_STABLE installation docs
have an extra section for installing on pre-9.2 versions, and that could
go away.
Should I add checks for a PostgreSQL version from each major version or just for one from the latest major version and the oldest version supported ? Like just test with 9.5 and 12.x . Same question with Java versions. Is testing with Java 9 and Java 14 (the latest java release) is enough ? Or each of java versions in between Java 9 and 14 should be tested as well.
view thread (47+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Starting build-system work (Windows/Mac users please speak up)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox