From: bgiles at coyotesong.com (Bear Giles) Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:42:33 -0600 Subject: [Pljava-dev] The pljava Project is dead (LONG but I hope interesting) In-Reply-To: References: <54DCEC2D.5050909@cgf.upv.es> <54DCF04D.9080805@manifest.co.uk> <54DD08B7.5070902@tada.se> <55AC048F.30401@anastigmatix.net> Message-ID: It's a big jump in scope but don't some databases have a native type for java classes and a way to execute them? (It's not hard to imagine a UDT for jar files as well.) It's not always possible to load jar files from the operating system. On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Craig Ringer wrote: > On 20 July 2015 at 04:11, Chapman Flack wrote: > > 9.1 goes EOL just over a year from now: > > http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/ > > > > So, by biting the bullet and declaring some reasonable newer cutoffs > > for back-compatibility, the project can become more contributor- > > friendly. > > > Cutting heavily to focus on an extension-only version with > 9.1-and-newer compatibility on JDK 6 (7?) seems sensible to me. > > The PgJDBC project doesn't maintain compatibility anywhere near as far > back as PL/Java, and we're about to advance the BC stops even further. > People who want to use old databases can use old versions of the > driver. > > The build system could also use some love. > > -- > Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services > _______________________________________________ > Pljava-dev mailing list > Pljava-dev at lists.pgfoundry.org > http://lists.pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pljava-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: