agora inbox for pljava-dev@postgresql.orghelp / color / mirror / Atom feed
[Pljava-dev] Pljava built 2+ messages / 0 participants [nested] [flat]
* [Pljava-dev] Pljava built @ 2011-01-20 13:36 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: @ 2011-01-20 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw) Hi Johann,thanks for your fast answer and interest. The binaries for windows are really interesting too because many people are using postgres for windows as well. This is my pole:Postgres 9 and Postgres 8.4 (maybe postgres 8.3 is not very interesting?)32 and 64 bits versionsWindows and Linux (dont know about mac as im not a mac user) sorry there are many combinations (8 different builds?)and it means a lot of work but it is necessary to make people use pljava widely.Best, PD: If there are many different builds and this is too much work for you, I would suggest to get rid of postgres 8.4 versions too as many linux distro and windows new intallation are not going to use it in next months. I think that Windows/Linux and 32/64 bits versions are necessary though.Jose Hi Jose,On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 5:37 AM, JOSE CARLOS MARTINEZ LLARIO> I dont thing pljava is an experimental project but mature one so to> distribute the binaries to the people who is using it would be a high> priority. If not the result could be some people are getting rid of pljava> or forcing to build it in not a 'good condition'.You're right. ?I'll add binaries for Linux at least as a priority.Hopefully I can also build Windows binaries soon. ?I'm also interestedin knowing what other platforms are also widely used.Johann -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pljava-dev/attachments/20110120/97a28364/attachment.html; ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
* [Pljava-dev] Pljava built @ 2011-01-20 13:37 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: @ 2011-01-20 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw) Hi Johann,thanks for your fast answer and interest. The binaries for windows are really interesting too because many people are using postgres for windows as well. This is my pole:Postgres 9 and Postgres 8.4 (maybe postgres 8.3 is not very interesting?)32 and 64 bits versionsWindows and Linux (dont know about mac as im not a mac user) sorry there are many combinations (8 different builds?)and it means a lot of work but it is necessary to make people use pljava widely.Best, PD: If there are many different builds and this is too much work for you, I would suggest to get rid of postgres 8.4 versions too as many linux distro and windows new intallation are not going to use it in next months. I think that Windows/Linux and 32/64 bits versions are necessary though.Jose Hi Jose,On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 5:37 AM, JOSE CARLOS MARTINEZ LLARIO> I dont thing pljava is an experimental project but mature one so to> distribute the binaries to the people who is using it would be a high> priority. If not the result could be some people are getting rid of pljava> or forcing to build it in not a 'good condition'.You're right. ?I'll add binaries for Linux at least as a priority.Hopefully I can also build Windows binaries soon. ?I'm also interestedin knowing what other platforms are also widely used.Johann -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pljava-dev/attachments/20110120/a1e1e7a5/attachment.html; ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-20 13:37 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-01-20 13:36 [Pljava-dev] Pljava built 2011-01-20 13:37 [Pljava-dev] Pljava built
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox