Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 07:44:48 +0000 Message-ID: From: dave.potts@pinan.co.uk In-Reply-To: References: <574B1594.6@anastigmatix.net> Subject: Re: [Pljava-dev] proposal: moderate pljava-dev Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2141706636287734098==" --===============2141706636287734098== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--=_RainLoop_563_883360124.1464594288" ----=_RainLoop_563_883360124.1464594288 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am only a listener on this news group=0A=0APlease do anything to get ri= d of spam=0A=0A30 May 2016 08:35, "Darsstar" wrote:=0A2016-05-29 18:15 G= MT+02:00 Chapman Flack :=0A=0A Thanks to Marc Fournier, pljava-dev is bac= k online. There isn't=0Avery heavy development traffic at the moment.=0A= =0AIn itself, that might not be much of a problem ... there is less=0Atra= ffic than before 1.5.0 came out, and may mean it is working=0Areasonably = well for most.=0A=0AOn the other hand, with so little real traffic, the o= ccasional spam=0Ablowing through gives the impression of tumbleweeds - th= e archives=0Alook more like spam than content lately, which isn't ideal.= =0A=0AI've asked Marc whether moderation is a feature that can be turned = on.=0AGiven the low volume of traffic, I would be happy to moderate. I sh= ould=0Aprobably not be the only one able to pass messages though, to make= =0Asure they're not held up if something happens to me.=0A=0AAny objectio= ns?=0A=0A-Chap=0A_______________________________________________=0APljava= -dev mailing list=0APljava-dev@lists.pgfoundry.org (mailto:Pljava-dev@lis= ts.pgfoundry.org)=0Ahttp://lists.pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pljava-de= v (http://lists.pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pljava-dev)=0ASounds good = to me! So no, I do not have any objections. ----=_RainLoop_563_883360124.1464594288 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I= am only a listener on this news group

Please do anything to get r= id of spam

30 May 2016 08:35, "Darsstar" <darsstar@gmail.com> wrote:
=C2=A0
2016-05-29 18:15 GMT+02:00 Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>:=

=C2=A0
Thanks to Marc Fournier, p= ljava-dev is back online.=C2=A0 There isn't
very heavy development tra= ffic at the moment.

In itself, that might not be much of a problem= ... there is less
traffic than before 1.5.0 came out, and may mean it= is working
reasonably well for most.

On the other hand, with s= o little real traffic, the occasional spam
blowing through gives the i= mpression of tumbleweeds - the archives
look more like spam than conte= nt lately, which isn't ideal.

I've asked Marc whether moderation i= s a feature that can be turned on.
Given the low volume of traffic, I = would be happy to moderate. I should
probably not be the only one able= to pass messages though, to make
sure they're not held up if somethin= g happens to me.

Any objections?

-Chap
_________________= ______________________________
Pljava-dev mailing list
Pljava-dev@lists.pgfoundry.org
http://lists.pgfoundry.org/ma= ilman/listinfo/pljava-dev

Sounds good to me! So= no, I do not have any objections.
----=_RainLoop_563_883360124.1464594288-- --===============2141706636287734098== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Pljava-dev mailing list Pljava-dev@lists.pgfoundry.org http://lists.pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pljava-dev --===============2141706636287734098==--