Message-ID: From: "df7cb (@df7cb)" To: "postgresql-interfaces/psqlodbc" Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:37:29 +0000 Subject: Re: [postgresql-interfaces/psqlodbc] issue #51: SQL_DESC_OCTET_LENGTH regression test difference In-Reply-To: References: List-Id: X-GitHub-Author-Login: df7cb X-GitHub-Comment-Id: 2444459908 X-GitHub-Comment-Type: issue_comment X-GitHub-Issue: 51 X-GitHub-Repo: postgresql-interfaces/psqlodbc X-GitHub-Type: comment X-GitHub-Url: https://github.com/postgresql-interfaces/psqlodbc/issues/51#issuecomment-2444459908 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Something is definitely wrong in this area. I've now added yet another descrec_2.out file to accept `10` as valid and the build passes on amd64, but it then fails on s390x (which is big endian): ``` 14:33:57 *** ./expected/descrec.out Wed Oct 2 11:15:31 2024 14:33:57 --- results/descrec.out Tue Oct 29 14:33:57 2024 14:33:57 *************** 14:33:57 *** 2,33 **** 14:33:57 14:33:57 -- Column 1 -- 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_NAME: col1 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_TYPE: 4 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_OCTET_LENGTH: 0 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_PRECISION: 0 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_SCALE: 0 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_NULLABLE: 0 14:33:57 14:33:57 -- Column 2 -- 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_NAME: col2 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_TYPE: 2 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_OCTET_LENGTH: 6 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_PRECISION: 4 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_SCALE: 2 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_NULLABLE: 1 14:33:57 14:33:57 -- Column 3 -- 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_NAME: col3 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_TYPE: 12 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_OCTET_LENGTH: 40 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_PRECISION: 0 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_SCALE: 0 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_NULLABLE: 0 14:33:57 14:33:57 -- Column 4 -- 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_NAME: col4 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_TYPE: -5 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_OCTET_LENGTH: 8 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_PRECISION: 0 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_SCALE: 0 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_NULLABLE: 0 14:33:57 --- 2,33 ---- 14:33:57 14:33:57 -- Column 1 -- 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_NAME: col1 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_TYPE: 0 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_OCTET_LENGTH: -67120400 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_PRECISION: 0 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_SCALE: 0 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_NULLABLE: 0 14:33:57 14:33:57 -- Column 2 -- 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_NAME: col2 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_TYPE: 0 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_OCTET_LENGTH: -67120400 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_PRECISION: 0 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_SCALE: 0 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_NULLABLE: 0 14:33:57 14:33:57 -- Column 3 -- 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_NAME: col3 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_TYPE: 0 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_OCTET_LENGTH: -67120400 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_PRECISION: 0 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_SCALE: 0 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_NULLABLE: 0 14:33:57 14:33:57 -- Column 4 -- 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_NAME: col4 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_TYPE: -1 14:33:57 ! SQL_DESC_OCTET_LENGTH: -67120400 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_PRECISION: 0 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_SCALE: 0 14:33:57 SQL_DESC_NULLABLE: 0 ``` ... which looks suspiciously like an endianess problem.