Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kcXhV-0004ZV-J0 for psycopg@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:45:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kcXhU-0008NF-Hk for psycopg@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:45:00 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kcXhU-0008N8-Cl for psycopg@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:45:00 +0000 Received: from mail.dndg.it ([178.32.136.2]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kcXhP-0008V0-Nv for psycopg@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:45:00 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.159] (93-40-251-202.ip41.fastwebnet.it [93.40.251.202]) by mail.dndg.it (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C503A08A4 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:47:34 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3? To: psycopg@lists.postgresql.org References: From: Federico Di Gregorio Organization: DNDG srl Message-ID: <6da2430d-1bba-ac0d-89cc-ca72a46e9da1@dndg.it> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 18:44:53 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On 10/11/20 18:12, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: > Hello, > > I have received some concerned voices in regard to have a package called > "psycopg3". I guess many have been burned out by the Python 2 to 3 > transition, and now it's not a happy pair of number to see next to each > other. Sorry, Fibonacci... > > The rationale behind having the 2 in the package name was to allow the > coexistence between v1 and 2. But now that nobody uses v1 anymore, I > think the name can be considered free. I believe it even predates pypi > and the requirements.txt convention. Dark times... > > Anyone against using "psycopg" as package name, and starting from 3 as > version number? Seems fine to me. federico