MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CA+mi_8Y5L-gnio+RUs6XtfOqEbOAiyVS8y9XqYSkfLB8dnPd8w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+mi_8Y5L-gnio+RUs6XtfOqEbOAiyVS8y9XqYSkfLB8dnPd8w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Patrick Starrenburg <patrick.starrenburg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:53:44 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CA+6L-Z8CzK=42PQTeGda7WCS2fXHA1_Cnrr-XQYygKfnBGzacA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
To: psycopg@postgresql.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009c053a05b476e564"
Precedence: bulk

--0000000000009c053a05b476e564
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi

I think the straight package name "psycopg" would be good.

PS

On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 15:46, Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I have received some concerned voices in regard to have a package called
> "psycopg3". I guess many have been burned out by the Python 2 to 3
> transition, and now it's not a happy pair of number to see next to each
> other. Sorry, Fibonacci...
>
> The rationale behind having the 2 in the package name was to allow the
> coexistence between v1 and 2. But now that nobody uses v1 anymore, I think
> the name can be considered free. I believe it even predates pypi and the
> requirements.txt convention. Dark times...
>
> Anyone against using "psycopg" as package name, and starting from 3 as
> version number?
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Daniele
>

--0000000000009c053a05b476e564
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Hi</div><div><br></div><div>I think the straight pack=
age name &quot;psycopg&quot; would be good.</div><div><br></div><div>PS<br>=
</div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">=
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 15:46, Daniele Varrazzo &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:daniel=
e.varrazzo@gmail.com">daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><b=
lockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-le=
ft:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"auto">Hello,<di=
v dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">I have received some concerned v=
oices in regard to have a package called &quot;psycopg3&quot;. I guess many=
 have been burned out by the Python 2 to 3 transition, and now it&#39;s not=
 a happy pair of number to see next to each other. Sorry, Fibonacci...=C2=
=A0</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">The rationale behind=
 having the 2 in the package name was to allow the coexistence between v1 a=
nd 2. But now that nobody uses v1 anymore, I think the name can be consider=
ed free. I believe it even predates pypi and the requirements.txt conventio=
n. Dark times...</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Anyone =
against using &quot;psycopg&quot; as package name, and starting from 3 as v=
ersion number?</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Cheers,</=
div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">-- Daniele=C2=A0</div></d=
iv>
</blockquote></div></div>

--0000000000009c053a05b476e564--