MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CA+mi_8Y5L-gnio+RUs6XtfOqEbOAiyVS8y9XqYSkfLB8dnPd8w@mail.gmail.com>
 <54a7e6b2-f785-e373-02ca-4fb35f8a9589@aklaver.com>
 <CAMqTPqn2=Vk3Se+ieWgSmgyd8O84G-3-JzUtD1m5M1udfr=6Dg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACACo5T+PBVTTgAASbEqK6cZQDwKDNSiPvfvCHsKHU3d1_Berg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CACACo5T+PBVTTgAASbEqK6cZQDwKDNSiPvfvCHsKHU3d1_Berg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthieu Rigal <matt.rigal@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:44:13 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CANygOGMT+fDUAGUdA7YdYVLoQRV3+3M0foST-F9QsZveoB6DDA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
To: Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr.shulgin@zalando.de>
Cc: Vladimir Ryabtsev <greatvovan@gmail.com>,
 Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>,
	Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>, psycopg@postgresql.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009e86ec05b3d0cddc"
Precedence: bulk

--0000000000009e86ec05b3d0cddc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I do also second that opinion. Also, the problem of "3" being connotated in
Python is fading out. Nobody should be scared by a "3" anymore...

My 3.9 cents

Le mer. 11 nov. 2020 =C3=A0 09:30, Oleksandr Shulgin <
oleksandr.shulgin@zalando.de> a =C3=A9crit :

> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 7:27 PM Vladimir Ryabtsev <greatvovan@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> As long as psycopg2 is not disappearing anywhere, psycopg3 seems better.
>> New users will interpret psycopg2 as "more advanced psycopg".
>>
>
> I second that opinion.  Also, a suggestion to skip "3" and go with "4"
> doesn't seem to help against the Python version confusion concern, assumi=
ng
> there is Python4 in some (distant?) future.
>
> My 3=C2=A2,
> --
> Alex
>
>

--0000000000009e86ec05b3d0cddc
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>I do also=C2=A0second=C2=A0that opinion. Also, the pr=
oblem of &quot;3&quot; being connotated in Python is fading out. Nobody sho=
uld be scared by a &quot;3&quot; anymore...</div><div><br></div><div>My 3.9=
 cents</div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_=
attr">Le=C2=A0mer. 11 nov. 2020 =C3=A0=C2=A009:30, Oleksandr Shulgin &lt;<a=
 href=3D"mailto:oleksandr.shulgin@zalando.de">oleksandr.shulgin@zalando.de<=
/a>&gt; a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" styl=
e=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);paddin=
g-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 7:27 =
PM Vladimir Ryabtsev &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:greatvovan@gmail.com" target=3D"=
_blank">greatvovan@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_qu=
ote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;bo=
rder-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">As =
long as psycopg2 is not disappearing anywhere, psycopg3 seems better.<div>N=
ew users will interpret psycopg2 as &quot;more advanced psycopg&quot;.</div=
></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I second that opinion.=C2=A0 Also, =
a suggestion to skip &quot;3&quot; and go with &quot;4&quot; doesn&#39;t se=
em to help against the Python version confusion concern, assuming there is =
Python4 in some (distant?) future.</div><div><br></div><div>My 3=C2=A2,</di=
v><div>--</div><div>Alex</div><div><br></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div></div>

--0000000000009e86ec05b3d0cddc--