public inbox for [email protected]help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Is requirements.txt up2date? 3+ messages / 2 participants [nested] [flat]
* Is requirements.txt up2date? @ 2019-06-05 11:59 Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Devrim Gündüz @ 2019-06-05 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgadmin-hackers <[email protected]> Hi, I recently hit by some missing or not up2date Python modules while building/installing pgAdmin4. Recent one is Werkzeug, and I also hit an issue with blinker. Both of these do not appear in requirements.txt. Are we sure that this list is up2date? Cheers, -- Devrim Gündüz Open Source Solution Architect, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR Attachments: [application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (833B, 2-signature.asc) download ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Is requirements.txt up2date? @ 2019-06-05 12:02 Dave Page <[email protected]> parent: Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Dave Page @ 2019-06-05 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgadmin-hackers <[email protected]> Hi On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 12:59 PM Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I recently hit by some missing or not up2date Python modules while > building/installing pgAdmin4. > > Recent one is Werkzeug, and I also hit an issue with blinker. Both of > these do > not appear in requirements.txt. Are we sure that this list is up2date? > Yes. They're indirect dependencies, so don't appear in the list we maintain. Not sure about Blinker, but Werkzeug will be defined in the requirements.txt file for Flask. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Is requirements.txt up2date? @ 2019-06-10 23:13 Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]> parent: Dave Page <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Devrim Gündüz @ 2019-06-10 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Page <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgadmin-hackers <[email protected]> Hi, On Wed, 2019-06-05 at 13:02 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > Yes. They're indirect dependencies, so don't appear in the list we > maintain. Not sure about Blinker, but Werkzeug will be defined in the > requirements.txt file for Flask. Ack, thanks! Cheers, -- Devrim Gündüz Open Source Solution Architect, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR Attachments: [application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (833B, 2-signature.asc) download ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-10 23:13 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-06-05 11:59 Is requirements.txt up2date? Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]> 2019-06-05 12:02 ` Dave Page <[email protected]> 2019-06-10 23:13 ` Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox