pgjdbc/pgjdbc GitHub issues and pull requests (mirror)help / color / mirror / Atom feed
[pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #3591: The Fedora CI seems to fail 7+ messages / 2 participants [nested] [flat]
* [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #3591: The Fedora CI seems to fail @ 2025-04-11 09:51 "praiskup (@praiskup)" <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: praiskup (@praiskup) @ 2025-04-11 09:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgjdbc/pgjdbc <[email protected]> For all the PRs, @mkoncek would you mind taking a look and sync with the Fedora downstream? ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #3591: The Fedora CI seems to fail @ 2025-04-11 10:01 ` "mkoncek (@mkoncek)" <[email protected]> 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: mkoncek (@mkoncek) @ 2025-04-11 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgjdbc/pgjdbc <[email protected]> Sure. ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #3591: The Fedora CI seems to fail @ 2025-04-11 10:05 ` "mkoncek (@mkoncek)" <[email protected]> 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: mkoncek (@mkoncek) @ 2025-04-11 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgjdbc/pgjdbc <[email protected]> `No match for argument: java-17-openjdk-devel`. Right, Java 17 has been dropped and new Java 21 is available in Fedora 42+. This will happen next with Java 25 in roughly half a year. ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #3591: The Fedora CI seems to fail @ 2025-04-11 10:08 ` "mkoncek (@mkoncek)" <[email protected]> 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: mkoncek (@mkoncek) @ 2025-04-11 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgjdbc/pgjdbc <[email protected]> Which `.spec` is used as the source for Copr? ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #3591: The Fedora CI seems to fail @ 2025-04-15 13:37 ` "praiskup (@praiskup)" <[email protected]> 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: praiskup (@praiskup) @ 2025-04-15 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgjdbc/pgjdbc <[email protected]> Sorry for the delay in responses, this: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/blob/master/packaging/rpm/postgresql-jdbc.spec.tpl ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #3591: The Fedora CI seems to fail @ 2025-04-15 13:55 ` "mkoncek (@mkoncek)" <[email protected]> 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: mkoncek (@mkoncek) @ 2025-04-15 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgjdbc/pgjdbc <[email protected]> I don't know how your tooling works, whether it has to refer to a file present in this repository. From my view the best solution would be to refer to actual Fedora `.spec` files for each version of Fedora. In the template file I already see some relicts of ancient times and I am surprised other errors were not shown. ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #3591: The Fedora CI seems to fail @ 2025-04-15 14:10 ` "praiskup (@praiskup)" <[email protected]> 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: praiskup (@praiskup) @ 2025-04-15 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgjdbc/pgjdbc <[email protected]> > From my view the best solution would be to refer to actual Fedora .spec files for each version of Fedora. :shrug: this used to work just fine for us (downstream) & upstream back then when I was part of the maintenance team @ Fedora. But feel free to fix the CI the way you prefer. Or we can drop it, if you do not need it. Just note that it is rather long-shot for upstream contributors to fix Fedora spec files just to make the upstream CI green (IOW, if we use one spec file from Fedora centrally - upstream contributors can not fix problems they are causing). > In the template file I already see some relicts of ancient times and I am surprised other errors were not shown. Yes, there used to be very verbose comment both sides trying to inform the future maintainers that these files should stay in sync. ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-15 14:10 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2025-04-11 09:51 [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] issue #3591: The Fedora CI seems to fail "praiskup (@praiskup)" <[email protected]> 2025-04-11 10:01 ` "mkoncek (@mkoncek)" <[email protected]> 2025-04-11 10:05 ` "mkoncek (@mkoncek)" <[email protected]> 2025-04-11 10:08 ` "mkoncek (@mkoncek)" <[email protected]> 2025-04-15 13:37 ` "praiskup (@praiskup)" <[email protected]> 2025-04-15 13:55 ` "mkoncek (@mkoncek)" <[email protected]> 2025-04-15 14:10 ` "praiskup (@praiskup)" <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox