From: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>
To: Atul Kumar <akumar14871@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: idle transactions vs memory
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2020 19:58:07 -0700
Message-ID: <10CEA2EF-210C-48F3-AC4C-F035292E6CAD@elevated-dev.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+ONtZ7mpJ7W43G19wATC7aipjUWqBDw1_QQdd7CARAvA7DS3w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+ONtZ7mpJ7W43G19wATC7aipjUWqBDw1_QQdd7CARAvA7DS3w@mail.gmail.com>
> On Dec 6, 2020, at 7:29 PM, Atul Kumar <akumar14871@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have a basic query that do idle transactions (idle more than 5
> minutes) occupy system memory (RAM) or CPU usage ?
Actual idle transaction? Or just idle connections not currently in transactions?
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com, akumar14871@gmail.com
Subject: Re: idle transactions vs memory
In-Reply-To: <10CEA2EF-210C-48F3-AC4C-F035292E6CAD@elevated-dev.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox