agora inbox for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Rainer Leo <leo@workfile.de>
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:21:53 +0200
Message-ID: <1102220903.20150622162153@workfile.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5587E6F9.50702@afilias.info>
References: <1862034146.20150622111438@workfile.de>
<e84cbc3cee08d8569cd670860c2b1900@imap.lan.net>
<5587E6F9.50702@afilias.info>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-admin>
>>> we are still using PostgreSQL 9.0.2 on Windows Server.
>>> Now we are migrating to Windows Server 2012 R2 and we
>>> would like to migrate PostgreSQL at the same time to
>>> the current version 9.4.4-1
>>> Which is the best way to migrate the data?
>>> 1. pg_dump on the old server
>>> 2. pg_retore on the new server
>>> 3. pg_upgrade on the new server
>>> Is this correct or is there a "best procedure" to do this?
>> You do either 1 + 2 OR 3. pg_upgrade is binary upgrade, where as
>> pg_dump + pg_restore is "logical" (dump data and schemal to SQL
>> instructions). If you go that way also check pg_dumpall for dumping
>> the globals.
>> Regards
>> Jan
> Also, for 1+2 you would be advised to do the pg_dump/restore using the
> *new* binaries (9.4), things could get tricky otherwise...
> Ziggy
Thanks for your help.
Using the 9.4 pg_dump on the old server did not work (missing
libintl-8.dll), so I used the 9.0 pg_dump.
pg_restore on the new server worked fine, BUT the perfomance is
lousy, for example a query that took 1732ms on the old server now
takes longer than 32000ms every time on 9.4
I tuned the postgres.conf exactly like the old one, except for more
RAM in some parameters.
Does this mean I have to install 9.4 on the old server so I can use
pg_upgrade?
Rainer
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
view thread (13+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <1102220903.20150622162153@workfile.de>
Permalink: ../1102220903.20150622162153@workfile.de/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/1102220903.20150622162153@workfile.de
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: leo@workfile.de
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade
In-Reply-To: <1102220903.20150622162153@workfile.de>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox