pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
To: Rajesh Kumar <rajeshkumar.dba09@gmail.com>
To: Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Wraparound
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:23:34 +0100
Message-ID: <11927075cfe167d8b64df7e767b595e27fabe3b0.camel@cybertec.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJk5AtZmenJBWQmcru=fe_+Wzp90bpq5B68vHLrjTBkrEuRvhg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJk5AtZmenJBWQmcru=fe_+Wzp90bpq5B68vHLrjTBkrEuRvhg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 10:02 +0530, Rajesh Kumar wrote:
> Is autovacuum wraparound issue is when transaction id reaches
> autovacuum_freeze_max_age  or if transaction Reaches 2^32.
> 
> My autovacuum_freeze_age setting is 200million.
> 
> Db size is 150gb. 

2^31 is the magical number at which very old transactions become
transactions from the future, which would cause data loss unless
all old rows have been frozen.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe





view thread (9+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <11927075cfe167d8b64df7e767b595e27fabe3b0.camel@cybertec.at>
Permalink:  ../11927075cfe167d8b64df7e767b595e27fabe3b0.camel@cybertec.at/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/11927075cfe167d8b64df7e767b595e27fabe3b0.camel@cybertec.at

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: laurenz.albe@cybertec.at, rajeshkumar.dba09@gmail.com, pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Wraparound
  In-Reply-To: <11927075cfe167d8b64df7e767b595e27fabe3b0.camel@cybertec.at>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox