pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Very slow 101-feeling design/query..
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:16:42 -0600
Message-ID: <144f1205-22cc-b6ef-b0f9-21c7d271397a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOC+FBWG-0BH_prvkbMTFuAQ37pr+Kx3S=V=krE1qkGhojXtJw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOC+FBWG-0BH_prvkbMTFuAQ37pr+Kx3S=V=krE1qkGhojXtJw@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/10/21 4:53 PM, Wells Oliver wrote:
> This feels very 101 but I feel like it should be much faster:
>
> A table "joints" with a PK of play_uuid, target_id, joint_seq, 
> joint_timestamp.
>
> "joints" is partitioned using RANGE on joint_timestamp for monthly 
> partitions 1/1 - 2/1, 2-1 - 3/1, etc.
>
> "joints" has an FK where play_uuid refers to table "plays" and 
> column "play_uuid" where "play_uuid" is the PK.
>
> "plays" additionally has an indexed column game_id.
>
> "joints" has 1133,932,391 rows across 12 monthly partitions for 2021, and 
> "plays has 585,627 rows. We made a view called "vw_joints" which just does:
>
> SELECT * FROM joints JOIN plays USING (play_id);
>
> Then doing:
>
> SELECT DISTINCT game_id FROM vw_joints
>
> Takes 35-45 minutes. Which seems nuts. We do this kind of design in a few 
> different plays to normalize things, but it comes at the cost of these 
> agonizingly slow (and seemingly dead simple) qeuries.
>
> Is there any optimization to do here beyond flattening table and 
> de-normalizing data? Is the partitioning causing a slowness here? I feel 
> like partitioning is creating some difficulty...

What Postgresql version?

What does the query plan look like?

-- 
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.





view thread (14+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <144f1205-22cc-b6ef-b0f9-21c7d271397a@gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../144f1205-22cc-b6ef-b0f9-21c7d271397a@gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/144f1205-22cc-b6ef-b0f9-21c7d271397a@gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com, pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Very slow 101-feeling design/query..
  In-Reply-To: <144f1205-22cc-b6ef-b0f9-21c7d271397a@gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox