From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Encoding problem using pg_dumpall
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:06:41 -0500
Message-ID: <14708.1233277601@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200901292014.29195@zmi.at>
References: <75E4C42D37E6A74E9FB57C2E9F1300D60107073E@tiger.nexperience.com>
<7403.1233250794@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<4981EB35.5060106@hagander.net>
<200901292014.29195@zmi.at>
Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at> writes:
> Why couldn't pg_dumpall get the same behaviour as pg_dump? It could get
> that -Fc, and couldn't it be implementet as "call pg_dump for each db
> and once for the system"? Why is it that different at all?
The -Fc (and -Ft) formats are only designed to hold the contents of a
single database; and pg_restore only knows how to restore into a single
database.
If you feel like fixing that, step right up.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Encoding problem using pg_dumpall
In-Reply-To: <14708.1233277601@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox